We designed Breakthrough to support teams as they increase and strengthen the knowledge and skills that innovators frequently call upon.
We organize these foundational elements into four pillars:
We designed Breakthrough to support teams as they increase and strengthen the knowledge and skills that innovators frequently call upon.
We organize these foundational elements into four pillars:
Our approach combines coaching, human-centered design, and developmental evaluation as we help teams advance along the innovation pipeline.
Breakthrough’s coaching model is built on partnership: Each team works with a dedicated coach who comes to understand the nuances of their innovation, their context, and their constraints. The team receives tailored guidance and insights that align with their goals via biweekly coaching calls and working sessions at Breakthrough’s in-person learning workshops.
We use principles and strategies from human-centered design (HCD) to help teams advance their innovations. HCD is an approach that innovators use to understand a problem and design solutions that work for the people they’re intended to serve.
During their time in Breakthrough, innovation teams start by clearly defining the problem—framed as “the challenge”—and engaging with end users through interviews, observations, and other real-world interactions. These openings help teams understand people’s needs and experiences, along with what has or has not worked for them in the past. Teams then review what they learn, identify key insights, and explore multiple possible solutions. They quickly test promising ideas with end users, gather feedback, and make changes to their innovation as they learn. This process is repeated throughout the program to help teams build solutions that are practical, effective, and responsive to real-world conditions.
We use developmental evaluation to support learning and adaptation—for both Breakthrough as an accelerator and for the teams we support. Evaluation activities are a key part of Breakthrough, and our team regularly examines data to inform decision making and program improvement.
Unlike traditional evaluation, which often measures success at a fixed point in time, developmental evaluation recognizes that innovation is not linear. We embrace developmental evaluation not only as a method, but also as a learning mindset that allows us—and our teams—to make meaningful pivots amid the uncertain context of innovation, while maintaining rigorous evaluation practices.